Art and technology have long inspired each other, but recent advancements are driving their fusion like never before.
From AI-generated art and immersive experiences to new ownership models, the creative landscape is evolving in ways we could barely imagine a few years ago. This fusion of creativity and innovation isn’t just adding to the world of art. It’s redefining it, making us rethink what art can be and who has the tools to create it. One such innovation is interactive art.
With interactive art, artists can break down traditional boundaries between the creator and the viewer. Participatory art involves the audience directly, allowing them to influence the outcome of the artwork itself. Artists are using technologies like motion tracking, sensors, and facial recognition to create installations that change based on viewer movement, expression, or even mood.
This level of interactivity invites viewers to move from passive observation to active participation, making them a part of the artwork’s story. This trend reflects a cultural shift toward collaboration and personalization, where audiences expect to be involved in the creative experience. Participatory art installations are not only transforming gallery experiences but also allowing viewers to experience art as an unfolding story that changes with each interaction.
🔗 Texto adaptado de: Petra Ivanigova. The Future of Art and Technology: Key Trends Shaping the Creative Landscape. Disponível em: medium.com. Acesso em: 2024.
🟨 Questao 12
In the context of text 1A3-I, the pronoun “it” in “redefining it” (fourth sentence of the first paragraph)
(A) replaces “This fusion”.
(B) refers to the word “art”, mentioned in “what art can be”.
(C) replaces the fragment “the world of art”, mentioned in the previous sentence.
(D) refers to the same group of words as the pronoun “it” in “create it”.
(E) refers to the same word as the pronoun “It” in “It’s redefining”.
Gabarito: C
🧭 Leitura orientada
Na frase “It’s redefining it”, o primeiro it é um sujeito vazio que retoma “this fusion of creativity and innovation”. O segundo it precisa retomar algo já mencionado antes.
📝 Analise tecnica das alternativas
(A) Incorreta. “This fusion” é o sujeito do primeiro it, não do segundo. 🚩 Pegadinha da banca: confundir dois pronomes iguais com mesma referência.
(B) Incorreta. “art” aparece depois; o pronome retoma algo já mencionado. 🚩 Pegadinha da banca: apontar para palavra posterior no texto.
(C) Correta. O trecho anterior diz “the world of art”, e “redefining it” retoma exatamente esse grupo de palavras. 🚩 Pegadinha evitada: identificar o antecedente imediato correto.
(D) Incorreta. O it de “create it” refere-se a “what art can be”, não a “the world of art”. 🚩 Pegadinha da banca: misturar referências de pronomes diferentes.
(E) Incorreta. O primeiro It é sujeito vazio; o segundo é pronome de objeto com referência concreta. 🚩 Pegadinha da banca: achar que pronomes idênticos têm sempre o mesmo referente.
🚩 Armadilhas da banca
A banca tenta confundir o candidato usando dois “it” na mesma frase. Só o segundo é pronome referencial, e ele aponta para “the world of art” do período anterior.
🧠 Resumo B3GE™ Master
Em “It’s redefining it”, o segundo it retoma “the world of art” da frase anterior. Gabarito: C.